A Super Over For A Big Decision….A Mock !

The ICC must have Foresight
[ What a mock the 110 overs …And for decision..6 balls more….But tie… but amazing in 100 overs match isn’t resulted and then 5-5 overs … Not decided the then 6 balls more to decide a big result…No it’s not justification…. In this kind of crucial matter the ICC experts need to think sincerely to have prior foretsight and the match will play again on the next date with new start… Boundary and over boundary count is just a mock ..]

Alas what a mock that the match’s decision is decided on the maximum boundaries hitting base ….Not on the score base . Yes it’s a big joke for the game cricket and big scolding of the ICC thinktank and its laws. If the match would be decided on the boundaries base then why had the super over drama been made.The score was tied up up to 51 overs for both the teams’ play then why was result decided on innings boundaries base. To hit six in the game is bigger and most entertaining and hailing event and it is the most welcoming act so the match must decided on the over boundary base. There should be 5 overs each for both the teams and one who hot out most sixes would be the winner.
Game cricket is defame to have many derogatory and disputed rules that almost indigested for the cricket fraternity. Likewise the rain interrupted match and called off in which Duck Worth Luis Law and one point to each whether it is a mammoth or minnow… so there is prior or unanimous criteria… which shocks the fans and the team/teams.
And one more striking point to mind ….that is for the champion …yes through out the tournament the teams which makes the place in the final must be undefeated …. because the teams which make place in the final in maximum points and between these two one becomes the Champion is mocked by the teams and fans that had defeated those teams in the group or league encounter. So that champ is not the undisputed champ. So what to do for be the undisputed champ…. yes for that the teams or team which has defeated against the team in the league or group match must play the match again and not one match but best of three that it is proven that that lose wasn’t accident or fortunate. These kind of provisions would make cricket so fair ,so passionate and so entertaining…and the spectators will throng for this kind of happening and the ICC could earn extra income in its treasure or hands.
And one more striking point that the teams have limited DRS ….But after spending the DRS the on field umpires confirmed each decision with the third umpire or match referee and if not out they change the decision. We know in the final the New Zealander Rose Tylor was not out but due to lack of review he did not stay and went to the pavilion . If the umpire confirmed the decision then the pictures would be different.And this kind of confirmations are so beneficial for both the teams. On each LBW the on field umpire confirm with the match referee and if wrong they must turn or dismiss his/her decision. The on field umpires refer each run out decision for confirmation then why not the dubious LBWs. There are big and bitter reactions after the final of 2019 between NL and England and Champ.
So for the betterment of the game and for fair champion the ICC must decide all rules by revise and to have precision.
*NK Sevak “Sevak “