IAN Chappal & His Opinion On LBW in Cricket: My Reaction

Ian Chappal & His Opinion On LBW Rule : My Reaction
[ One of Australia’ s legendary cricketer who has suggested a new rule on the most controversial decision under the out systems in the game of cricket . He says if the ball strikes or struck on the pad and the umpire thinks it was hitting the stumps he can declare the batsman out . He says pads are on the legs to protect legs not the stumps. Further he points out that the ball is going to hit out stumps and if that strike on the pad before bat whether batsman offer shot or not must be declared out. It is because many batsmen with mindset trickily do this willingly to save their wicket. )

Yes in the game of cricket the LBW rule is the most disputed
And due to it the awesome incidents happened in the ground
Under it SM Gavaskar- D Lillee episode is ah dreadful and woeful
And for that the gentleman of the game yes S Gavaskar is got defame
Though ethically and authentically Sunny was right
But legally not and nay why because of the game’s ultimate rule the then
There was no DRS rule and onfield umpire’s verdict was final
Despite right no batsman could oppose or react against the decision
The umpire is considered as the God in the field
And there is decision is always ultimate and correct
Whether you are right or wrong
Yes you need to accept any how generously
Before technology many cricketers career has ruined such as built due to umpires’ wrong and partial decision
And due to their judgement career get affected
We know the man is the effigy of errors
And the umpires are also the man
And mistakes are liable but sometimes happen naturally
But sometimes willingly if we remind Pakistan’s Shakoor Rana
And time by time the lobby of umpires is objected , blamed
Before 90s there no neuter umpire system
And player like Imran who has high cadre in the game
Yes demanded or suggested for neutral umpires
But despite this some loathsome scam exposed
Yes the fixing blames have been come in light
And despite technology some decision modes are still in obscure
Because we know the technology is made by man and not God
What I want to mentioned it all
Yes it is prelude to hear out my wry
What ? Yes LBW decision is very disputed ever
And despite DRS not cent percent convincing
So what should the game cricket do in this sense
Yes to solve out this big problem permanently
Yes here NK Sevak “Sanatan” advocacy
What……………………?
Yes , keep 6 stumps instead of three
And the batsman can use the pads to save his wicket
But the batsman must not be declared out
If his leg side cornered is struck violates or exploits
But mind if the batsman tries to stop that ball to protect his wicket
And rebound ball struck from the pad/pads and the fielder hold it before grounded the batsman must declare out
Why the batsman would declare out on padding
It so because in the field he is a warrior
And his opponent is also a warrior
And both use the weapon, one torpedo other dagger
Game is indirect war and so no place of grace there
So the rules must be impartial
So it is final if the batsman use pads and padded soaring ball under authentic catch
So there would be no LBW out mode rest in the game
And there would be exrinction of disputed rule for ever
So I conclude if the five wicket norm is nodded by the ICC
Then wow a woeful reactive mode of LBW our
Yes would say adieu or farewell for ever
It would enrich the game it is way with healthy technique
And no umpire would be blame to have this decision.
And we know each game is undeclared unbloody war
And in the war the warriors use the shield to protect body or life
And it is cleared if the shield isn’t use by the war against the blow it was sure he would get injury or lose out life.
Such as in the game if pad isn’t use or come across or ahead the batsman’ s game was over.
*By
NK Sevak “Sanatan”
Cricket critic,expert
& Viewer