Great Democracy Is In Sanatan’s Question!
Great Democracy Is In Great Questions !?!
Democracy is the majority mandate based ruling system. Ah, in it, the person’s qualification is only the minimum age, yes, 25 and that can stake out the candidature to be the public representative. And ah there are 5000 voters, they all cast their vote under suffrage and result comes 3500/1500, yes, of the two candidates and obviously under the accepted rule the 3500 vote getter will hold the seat and becomes the political democratic boss, yeah, of those 5000 people in which, ah, those 1500 who voted against him are also included and due to the rule have to endure or bear for five years.
Abraham Lincoln’s Timeless Truest Definition On Democracy
Yeah, one of the greatest ever statesmen of the global political arena, Mr. honourable Abraham Lincoln who was the 16th President of the Great Democratic Nation and pioneer of Modern Democracy, The USA, eradicated the slavery system in America and that impact was highly that in other nations of world this inhuman evil system was delegitimized or ended in the world. And for that human welfare and equality task he was killed by a white man. But he had already completed his great mission as apostle of His Power. His nation America and the world is ever grateful to him for that great spirited deed. He was by profession an advocate and was a great advocator of Democracy. On Democracy, the bestest unanimous and nodded ruling system, many definitions have been given by the pedagogues or protagonists but the definition of Mr. Lincoln rests at the top. Yes, what Mr. Lincoln says, ‘What is Democracy – yes, For the people, of the people, by the people.’
And obviously it fitted utmost in supreme sense for this much admired and accepted rule system. And formally, these all happen in activity in the system but the main and major factor, the public who is the real government because of its creator or father, ah, remains only a watcher and bearer after election for five years or according to nation’s rule of stint or tenure.
Thus the first main factor is side-lined after voting and the elected candidate, wow, reigns on those who made him the leader. Democracy is stood on the leadership base, party base. And the main task of the elected candidate who is now boss is to serve his people. Yeah, serve means to provide essential fundamental facilities to the public. And provide employment, control over inflation and other public welfare schemes implementation. It means to heed or attend all nation development in whole sense that each citizen as a nation feels proud.
But we see the rich people are elected due to money power and status. The political party system is dangerous and it snatches out the right of a common man and ineligible persons get party tickets on money status base or only on seniority base that he had become the candidateof the party much before . Seniority and experience means not a complete eligibility or qualification.
In many sectors the persons are promoted only on passing time in the department and passing time makes a person senior and it gives him right to promotion without any extra toil and many times only formal qualification. Yes, a B.Sc., B.Ed. person becomes 2nd grade teacher, after 18 years he becomes Principal but not by M.Sc. but in other easier subject all formally to get promotion that the person is PG degree holder. And it’s more serious that a person is BA with English Literature, Political Science and Geography. His percentage in three years degree course is 46 percent. But amazing, in English literature in the three years his percentage is thirty two and every year passed through 4 marks grace under government rule. But under overall percentage he has 46 because in practical subject Geography he has 90 plus percent where recommendation, money, bribe, teachers grace work.
Through this academic structure and mirror I do clear that seniority doesn’t stay quality and qualification but in politics and academic field it is preferred.
Yes,to be a politician ,yeah, the person must be work in the political field for 25 years at least. And maximum academic qualification and certain years public service must be essential to get ticket through party.Yes,in this concerned mr NDModi fitted as the best example that he did public service as the volunteer(In Hindi Swayam Sevak under world’s biggest public organisation-RSAmS) .
In my sense ,yeah, the polotical party system must be deleted from the political system. Yes, the persons stake on personal choice or favourite area and they all reach Parliament but through speeches and public service nationally the PM would be fixed through national votes. For each ministry post there must be national election, yeah, each voter of the nation does vote and the post decided like the Prime Minister and President, not through delegates.
India’s leading modern philosopher Mr. Dr. Radhakrishnan’s Opinion, stand on Democracy
India’s most buzzing and echoing or celebrating personality as the Professor and Philosopher and later as Vice Chancellor and Nation’s President Mr. honourable Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan put his worthy stand on Democracy. He says in his views that the democratic system or Democracy isn’t okayed until all the national voters are at least PG degree holders. Behind this concept his attitude was that the PG degree holder person is intellectual mass and well known with the system so will use his vote with all prudence and would vote only to a genuine and eligible person in all sense.
It’s a good idea but Sanatan NK asks, Is PG a guarantee to be eligible? No, because we know degrees are bought. Even for the most serious and significant work, Doctors, where on huge amount base and conspiring corrupt system works. Earlier big paper leaking scam the nation watched. And the day before, yes, on yesterday in the Dainik Bhaskar Newspaper I read that six persons were found ineligible in India who got degree from abroad. We have seen in China 90 percent Ph.D. degrees were on copy-paste or forgery or false. So academic system is under jeopardy.
Yes,a prrson can be PG and PH.D but textually not practicall or in behavioral manner (in this sense there is a mind-blowing story in the indisn fables -yes there were three highly educated and highest degree holder in textual academic field ……!! Sorry i am not narrating that short story here ) . So ,how can PG degree holder only be the voter, how can the idea of great philosopher work on ground.
Yeah, then what is the real way that the person votes for a prior person. For it the Ethical or Moral based education must be required. Maximum persons choose politics only to get power and money. We see that the person who has come in the politics through a party and recommendation of his organisation whose property was in thousands but after entrance in politics he becomes billionaire. His relatives also become millionaire. It means they looted public welfare money, yeah, nation’s money.
So what is the perfect solution of it. Yeah, under my devil or angel thinking, the person who passes at least 40 years in public as a leader and after only the age of 70 the person could be the candidate for any democratic post. And after it no bungalow, no cars, no salary, no pension, yes, all simple life like Mr. Lal Bahadur Shastri. Then the charm would be automatically reduced to join Politics because there is no power, only service, genuine nation and public service.
One Important Point
Yes, according to me monarchy is the best ruling system,why ? Yes, if the ruler is eligible and good in all human qualities. The king nominates his ministers reckoning his/her grounded backgrounds and also nature and qualification. Yes, not flatterers. And there is no rivalry and huge money expenses on election because only the legal heir will be the successor. And there is no extra ambitions of rest of the people of kingdom.
Due to temporary power in the political field the elected person amasses abundant nation’s property. The money what he gets for public development, he loots indirectly and also benefits his relatives, his friends and flatterers and those who offer him maximum commission in tenders. So democratic seats lure persons to earn maximum in his five year term. And many politicians spend huge money in election campaign so they recover (in India Vasool) the money as soon as possible.
So in many senses democracy has leakage, yeah, hollowness. The main objective of politician was public service but in avarice he/she becomes corrupt. And it’s amazing that on 1.45 Arab ( One Hundred Forty-five Crores or in international standard count ,yeah, 1450 millions or 1.45 billion ) people only 552 (As MPs) people reign and of those 551, one person dominates as a Prime Minister. Though in monarchy only one reigns but it’s hierarchy and legacy. But in democracy those 542 representatives aren’t the choice of all and only on majority base they are selected.
Amazing, undigested, ridiculous, mocking fact
A Rare Result in the Election
A stunning result history in india ‘s one of the state or province Rajasthan ,state election
Yes, unbelievable, what, yeah, in an assembly election (Vidhan Sabha – State Election) here in Rajasthan state in Nathdwara, Rajsamand Constituency, Congress party state president and established and stout politician and leader C.P. Joshi lost the election by only one vote. There were 4 lacs voters in the Constituency and he lost the election only by one vote. And see that C.P. Joshi’s mother didn’t cast her vote. If she would have cast her vote in her son’s favour the tally of votes would have been equalled. Then think what would happen. Yes, then as per the rules and to save huge money for re-election which would be an extra burden and waste of public and administration time, yeah, there would be the chit system followed and there luck would work. There would be two chits and an innocent child or baby would pick one and the luck would decide the reign or post. If Mr. C.P. Joshi would have won that election he would have held the CM (Chief Minister) post because he was not only the party leader of state but was a strong senior leader.
So it’s irritating that a person loses the election only by one vote. And Aristotle the great has said and Bernard Shaw has confirmed the fact through his reaction that Democracy is the rule of fools here i mean majority and majority could be wise or fool. Why, because it decides the person and post through the majority, yeah, not on quality and qualification base.
Suppose there in election area 10 thousand voters in which 9000 were illiterate, nonsense and foolish or simpleton (not foolidh because for a voter mentally healthy must be sound otherwise couldn’t use franchise) 😄. And 1000 very intelligent and highly educated. Two candidates stake out the claim through candidature. One from intellectual lobby, one from a foolish lobby. And you know who will win. Yes, the fool, because he has majority.
Striking Piercing Quote of my Satan’s Mirror, yeah ,of great John Milton
• ☆ Man doesn’t like slavery of others that’s why he preferred or chosen Democracy as thyself SLAVERY over other ruling systems.
nk sanatan
• ☆ The most drawback of democracy is that there is no person is the owner of the nation. Formally all the citizens are the owners but indirectly and the elected government and government sectors are also the owners but for a certain time or years and they looted the government property because no one is the direct and live master of the nation .So no personal loss so government servants and government use the system exploiting it in their ways and facilities. There is the constitution and judiciary system and formally independent but behind the curtain the judges are nominated by the government bosses so not outer but inner they are puppets and work accordingly to government guidance. So many verdicts affect in their ways .
Yeah, mind boggling quote of my Devil ‘s approach
Through Democracy each voter gives right,yes, very consciously to his favourite candidate to use his power and him at possible high excess on being public representative up to remain in his given power.