Virat Kohali’s 149 Not Chance less !!

People don’t mind black stains ….!
( In cricket on the chanceless innings )

People and History do not count wounds
They only remember the wars and its results
Sports and games are like the war
But yes blood- less and agony apart
Through it rivals of both parties enjoy
In cricket 5 wicket haul and score 100 matters
And critics,experts,sports persons review
And evaluate rank it number one ,two ,three..
In Hadingley,Leeds in the 3rd Ashes meet
Wow England perform a unbelievable feat
England as the host need to chase 369 run target
And at one point needs 76 run
While have only one wicket in hands
The last batsman with the dominating guy
Were on 94 and drops by the rival
Sorry for the guest at the crucial stage
The fielder T Harris does not drop Ben
But he drops Ashes win if mind S Wagh’s quote
And after that drop B Strokes endorses out
Yes the luck by determined its God’s will
He then two sixws in row and completes century
And by remaining unbeaten on 135
He makes his team win and country men proud
But putting this disscussive note
What i want to vindicate and indicate
Yes the historians would let it great innings
Because the essence of the match England win
And B Strokes was a customer of it
People would mind S Leach rocking stay of 17
Yes not run but balls that was matter at that time
When Wisden or ICC would evaluate
Yes the greatest innings of all time
Then B Strokes’ innings would be in top five
History always named it heroic innings
But the critics of dense kind inscribe or ravel
Yes the black stains on the name of objection
They would say it was not chance less
And that’s why not agreed it as great
But it is not in one of the greatest centuries
Okay but Strokes was dropped on 94
So 94 is not an ordinary score in dier condition
Yes once Virat makes 154 against England
And the media showers praises
Yeah a great innings but forget the stains
Yes drops on 23 and 49 so what is his real score
And is it considered as the great innings
If evaluate it so densely then not
Critics point of view it is under scrutiny
And certainly underestimate by letting not great
It is the rival’s folly that it give chance
Not the guilt of the batsman
They gave him the chance and he endorsed out in his way
Ok it was not the batsman fall and fielder was guilty
But under evaluation for measured greatness
These kinds of scrutiny matters
Yes essential to count for obvious mirror
For indisputable and unanimous nod this kind of observance liable.
*NK Sevak “Sanatan “