CricketvArena: No Ball Rule Is disputed!

Two Bounces can’t be declared No Ball always
{On Dead /No ball Rule an objectionable query }
On Mark Taylor’s one delivery that is declared No Ball by the Umpire in a 1st class Prume Minister Eleven Game )
*In a Test Match A Ball Deliver By Mark Taylor To Angus Frazer That bounced Twice on the pitch and umpire declared that as the No Ball )

*Mark Tylor saw a dream in a night about the ball that bowled to Angus Frazer and that ball was declared No Ball because that ball took two bounce on the pitch and according to the Law of Cricket Book the umpire decision was right because the
Ball that bounce s twice on the is considered as the No Ball.
*The Provoker of Mark Taylor – Guy why did you not object when your delivery that to Angus Frazer .
Mark Taylor- Bro what do you mean what do you want to say?
The Provoker- I mean that that delivery was not no ball.
Mark Taylor- Why, why that was not No Ball while it was bounce twice .
The Provoker – Yes guy you are right that ball bounced twice on the pitch but in this regard you need to think
*Mark Taylor- What to think
The Provoker – Yes in this decision you need to suit case in the ICC court
*Mark Taylor – What Rubbish you do say
The Provoker – Mr Taylor I do say that the decision was wrong because it was the batsman’s mistake that he came forward to play and missed it and after missing the ball bounce slightly and struck to the wickets ans it was quite clean bold. If the ball would come on the bat then it wouldn’t be the No Ball.
Mark Taylor Why are you stop guy clear more
The Provoker – yes there is need to revise this rooted rule . It must be extended to see this tragic happening . In this regard if the batsman comes at the forward and misses and after it behind him the ball takes 2 nd spot or bounce and the ball collide to the wicket there would be cleaned bold clearly and if ball goes behind the stumps then there would not be No Ball. But yes if the ball spots twice or bounce twice ahead of batsman then the umpire can declare that as No Ball. But if the ball is delivered as over arm or round arm and the ball is spotted twice or thrice there should not be No Ball. In this sense the batsman should be vigile and need to play cautiously . Yes in this sense the umpires must be wise to think that the ball wasn’t diverse deliberately particularly at the critical stage . If the ball spots twice ,thrice then that could be played for huge shot .
If think closely two or three bouncing ball can be said Lollypop and it can be chewed ,munched, crunched ,eaten very easily . What is batsman ship …..Yes to keep close look or vigilancy /vigilant and play and in this sense the batsman can’t understand or measure the length then it is the mistake of the batsman and there should not be declared the No or Dead ball by the umpires . So for the future the bowlers would be justified if you suit or lodge appeal or plea .
This the micro point and need to be revise . And such as the hook shot and hit wicket out. If the ball goes across the boundary line or over the boundary line before being hit the wicket then 6 or 4 as per the rule should be award to batsman and if the batsman hits the stump before crossing the ball outside the boundary line then the batsman should be declared out and no score will award to the batsman.
For the welfare of the game the required amendment must be done .
NK Sevak “Sanatan”