The Four Allrounders That Buzzed A Lot were not Genuin Allrounder !

Four Allrounders Of The Decades 1971 to 1990
Four allrounders Imaran Khan,Richard Hadlee,Ian Bothom and Kapil Dev are the big buzzing figures of cricket as the allrouder.
But by peeping theee four
ones’ stats closely then these all four rest only the genuine bowlers. Yes if see the batting statistics of these four allrounders then Imran Khan’s batting track is greater than these four.Yes as the batter by playing 88 Test matches scored 3807 runs and hit away 6 hundreds and 18 half hundreds. 136 was his highest individual Test score. Imran ‘s batting average is 37.69 and thus as the batter if compare with the specialist batsmen then rests as the average batsman.
His contemporary Ian Bothom who played 102 Tests and scored 5200 runs by keeping 33.54 but slammed 14 Test centuries and 22 fifties and his highest individual score remained 208. The third contempory of them yeah the most buzzing cricket allrounder Kapil Dev who played 131 Tests and amassed 5248 runs by slamming 8 hubdreds and 27 half hundreds and his highest Test individual innings was 163.And the forth vital and prosperous allrounder of this era is Richard Hadlee who played 86 Tests and made 3124 runs and hit out only 2 hundreds and 15 half hubdreds. If see the batting average of these four allrounders yeah Richard Hadlee has 27.16 ,Kapil Dev has 31.05 Kapil Dev , Ian Bothom has 33.54 and Imran Khan has
37.69 and thus Imran seems higher batsman than the threes and Richard Hadlee rest at number four as the batsman with a poor batting average.My discourse points out that We can say these fours only the genuine batsman . Yes these were entertainer as the batsman and were not reliable and consistant . In these four Kapil Dev was very aggressive and so unreliable and inconsistant and his run striking rate reveals it that he used to play with aggression. Kapil Dev has 8 Test centuries and 27 half centuries on his name
reveals that he had the good capabilities to bat soundly but many a time didn’t take onus and gifted his wicket cheaply. And for this temper and nature was shaked off once and also rebuked when he awarded his wicket at the crucial phase when he was promoted to get few runs to win india historically in Oval when Sunil Gavaskar the great singlehandedly put। India in the certain winning pisition.
What should be the norms for a big and good Allrounder ? Yeah according to me for a big allrounder the batting average must be 50 plus at least and as the bowler the bowling average must be under 25. And on this criteria in these four greats no one can be said a genuine Allrounder. And now glimpse out on the bowling stats of these so called allrounder cricketers. Yes see the bowling average of Richard Hadlee who has
22.29 bowling average and rests at the supreme position among the quartet and imran Khan rests at the 2nd position with the handsone bowling average 22.81 then Ian Bothom rests at the 3rd with 28.40 and at the fourth Kapil Dev with 29.64 and if attain the norms of ICC experts penal that decides the greatness of the cricketers as the best batsmen,bowlers , captains,best innings,best bowling,etc. And under this for the all time best bowlers must have bowling average under 25 but for it the tally of Test career must be of 25 Test at least. And under this criteria only Richard Hadlee and Imran Khan placed in the elite list of great bowlers.Yeah Richard Hadlee and Imran Khan were genuine fast bowler while Ian Bothom and Kapil Dev were not quicker then their counterparts. Yeah both Kapil and Bothom remained the leading bowlers from their team and also were leading wicket taker. But alas due to certain criteria these two grewt bowlers aren’t in the list of best 50 bowlers.
Here to have this background I do point out that these four whom the cricket world known as the best Allroubder aren’t genuine allrounder. Yeah because of not good batting track and can be said the genuine bowler. If I attend some other allrounders who are considered the great allrounders yeah Kieth Miller Garry Soberse,Tony Greig,Warwick,Richie Bannaud ,Colin Smith,Mustaq Mohsmmed,Karl Hooper,Sanat Jaysurya/ Armstrong ,T
Gregory, Monty Nobel,Larry Constentine, Abey Faulkner, Eddie Barlow,Veenu Mankad ,C Cairans, Andrew Flintoff,MecMillen,Shane Pollock,
Shane ,Watson,L
Klusner ,Jaques Kallis,Jeson Holder, Darren Sami, Angilo Metthews, Imam Ul Haque,Ravindra Jadeja but we do not find the balanced combination in bowling and batting in any one’s data. Yeah for them some ones deserve the Bowling ~batting Allrounder or Batting ~bowling
Allrounder. For a genuine allrounder the terminology should be by my part rested Triple BCGAR or B Cube CG AR (BBBCGAR~Batting,Bowling, Balanced, Combination Genuine Allrounder) though term seems lengthy. If we do have to find the most balanced allrounder then Dough Walters is nearer to the criteria and Darren Lohmann ‘s stats are also good though he played only 27 Tests.
Ultinately i attend Garry Soberse whom the world have stamped as the greatest Allrounder but he is too a Batting~bowling Allrounder. And finally i do say that the Cricket World has to await such a big allrounder who would rest correct on the genuin stats to be said unanimously the bestest
genuine Allrounder. Yeah the international cricket history of long 145 years have seen many
cricketers but still awaiting that figure. Yeah there is no cricketer has shown balance performance to have rich stats in the bowling and bowling . Yeah to be said the allrounder the performance of the cricketer should be well in the fielding but according to me the cricketer should be good in the bowling and the batting
because fielding is the different arena. Yes if you count fielding that is only on catching base not on how many runs the fielder has have saved. And the captaincy and Keeping all fields must be included for the Allrounder yeah i mean the cricketer is completedly good in all these five skills must be called a genuin Allrounder. And the bowler who has equally command over spin and fast bowling like Kerson Gavari but need the impressive stats in both kind of bowling yes to say a complete allrounder.
*NK Sanatan