Test Legacy

If no matter of money then reserve the legacy and prodigy of the Test Cricket The beginning of instant or ODIs cricket was just an accident but later with the time it was fully accepted by the World Cricket Body or the Boss ICC. But ODI isn’t real cricket. It is lightweight format if compare to the Boxing where there are different category. And on the heavyweight format of the boxing no shield of any kind. Yeah no head protector . So in the game with the entrance of F50 and T20 the critic point of view there can be categorized as Heavyweight, Fantomweigh and Danton weight or light weight . Test Match is the toughest format where the batsmen bowlers and fielders are tested at every front or fore. But with the time some restrictions are made by the ICC. Under it the limitations of the bouncers, beamers, field settlement, etc are dominantly need to mark. Yeah those were the weapons of the bowlers and can say the bowlers were dominated in the game and there were many high risk factors the then . Because there was no helmet punny bat, thinner injury prone pads, gloves and abdemon, chest protector , thigh ,elbow protector, etc. The pitched were uncovered, bumpy, uneven, cracky, torny pitches and faulty site screens too were the factors and batting was not easy. Body line series is still considered as the black bloat in the Test cricket while in real sense nothing was wrong with the game. If you say there is injury ,blood ,risk in the game by saying it’s not cricket and the game of the gentlemen then you need to play badminton, chess or carom not the Test cricket. First of all the game Test cricket is the battlefield where rivals combat to overcome each other and everything is fair and lovely in the love and war such as according to me the game too. In boxing , bullfighting, Kababdi football, rugby ,polo, horse fixing , jump, race all have risk factors but the fans need to mind the fact that the persons who are brave and bold in real choose the sports -game and army service, space service. There is no ground there for the cowardices. And in the modern era facilitar have increase up to the heaven level so why is restriction in the game of cricket. If you have hammer like bat, solid helmet and other requiered protective gears then there shall be no ground for restrictions in the game. Technically if the ICC wants to make sound cricket they must lift up all kinds of bars or barriers.With time the materialism entered in the games and sports and its management bodies tempted toward money make factors and lure to the fans of different kinds the bodies implemented spectators’ pleasing rule rather than the combat or rivalry of real kind. Here only about the game cricket then we have seen that the game is made batsman proned whether it is the Test match ,ODIs or T20 format. Many people related to the administration say that due to implementation of F50 and T20 thr number of watchers are increased and due to it the Board’s income and such as the income of the players . So with professionalism added the commercialization . Though both the words are supplement to each other but here is technically bit difference in my sense. The players present themselves for auction and make advertisement is commercialism or marketing or marketism and play for nation on contract base is professionalism. Through this cry I want to stress out on real and fair combat. Here I mean no restrictions of any kinds in the game whether it is a Test Match, F50 or T20. Due to enforcement of two short format the cricketers used to prefer them only for big money in a short term and waged lesser. In the Test the players have to sweat out and passing through the real height.Why I emphasis on this issue only because of big lover of the game Test match which is seeming in trouble to have the introduction and greaterly preference to these formats and less Test series are bring in the ICC annual calendar. And so redicluous that IPL business tournament is being preferred over the Test only amass money and to provide big money to the corporates. And one more point needs to be mind that due to one dayers and twenty-twenty the real technique is being diminished and can say classism is in trouble. Everywhere the harsh music is heard and the bars of harp are loosened and damaged. So I do say there would be three board separately for the three formats and there would be different team for each. And there should be separated domestic platform for each. Different selectors or selection committees. So the players will cast or mould or tend themselves in the particular format and technique. So technique would not affect and the Test format’ s importance will aliive ever in its conservative form and height. And along with it the supplement formats would survive in their ways. So each kind of fans would have their choice and no complaint to two shorter formats.*NK Sevak “Sanatan”