☆OSHO RAJNEESH ‘S SAGA☆

🌹 RED ARMY’S SPIRITUAL GURU , MESMERIZED The WHITES 🫀

*Genre : PoemProzAAAA (My own raw and scattered stye- TelePrintAAAA & MessaZAAAA)
*Field : Criticism Philosophy

*(Prose Info discussing Poetry)*

A boy born in a Jain family, but
very different Jain sect yes not common tradition.
After being young rejected rites of the sect,can say ,he was culprit, yes religion’s sedition .

Yes in clear English term he was skeptic because his nature was rationalist yeah became iconoclast

At school, he was sensitive with highly
reasoning power
Yes, in the classroom, with his sharp logistic like tower.

Wow or Ah ! He sometimes left his teachers speechless
And the teachers said him freaky ,nonsense.

In college, his Principal and professors
too had to face his powerful argument
And fascinated to him , made him a oriented compatriot.

His attitude was sometimes freaky,
but shaking and worthy.
His reasoning was beyond understanding and yeah like mystery .

As a collegiate, he left his mark with brilliant results,yeah all.
Yes, he Mastered in Philosophy
with distinction,yeah, tall

He achieved a gold medal, dazzled all
He later became a professor proved a pal.

At that time, the present-day requirements of NET, SET and Ph.D. for college teaching
not existed.
So appointed professor directly due to meritorious scholar, and yeah felicitated .

Rajneesh was certainly a sharp intellectual.
He also guided research students,yeah as professional .

Although he himself was not a Ph.D. holder like other protagonists
But through his extraordinary knowledge ,left
all purists.

In the modern age, Ph.D. holders proudly puff their chests have perch
But now Rajnish himself became a subject of research.

Mr. Gandhi, Mr. Nehru, and laureate
Rabindranath Tagore,the greats personalities were not doctorate.
But ,yet their intellectual stature was beyond any academic title yeah accurate.

During his teaching period, Rajneesh known as Acharya,
Yeah a title associated with his intellectual and spiritual teaching.

In his sect the person had to burn his body through penance by being disciple of Munishree to pursuit monastic life.

For being Acharya , after six months or more years person becomes mumuksh (a trainee)
It means ,yes boss,uncovering body, sheer devotion, religious study and adopts nudity.

But Rajnish became not a frog of a well ,he became frog of the sea.
I mean not the sage of s limited community and religion.

And blazed as a big spiritual leader without nudity 😄
And through his spiritual journey achieved density.

He did not marry but enjoyed intimacy with many
Thus, he flouted celibacy in his way.

Yeah, like him Atal Bihari Vajpayee, a former Prime Minister
Yeah,a big poet, a great politician and
a demanding ,fascinating orator .

Yes ,he was unmarried but in worthy Parliament of India-Sansad.

He said all boldly in his witty banter style- rejoiced Sansad .

Yes, with snap finger -I am a bachelor but not celibate.
😄😄

He was a student of philosophy, history and Hindi Literarure
And also taught Philosophy at college level
So had served scented ,heavenly yummy soup to the listeners ,yeah preaching. .

And their was his freed and witty jolly style
that the followers multiplied in numbers,yes in a pile .
And became, a prime spiritual guru in India as Acharya Rajnish
And wow, soon his popularity expanded
globally.

He established an ashram in Pune,India.

And developed a highly distinctive style of preaching with meditation.

Yes,with a different theory , different thinking and approach.

His language was witty and funny
His deliverance was provocative but like orienting.

His philosophy was unconventional,
striking ,piercing.

He summed up his thrilling and unique idea in a book.

Yeah,with a sensitive but curious title –
“Sambhog Se Samadhi.”
In English it means -Intimacy To Meditation .
Or From Sex To Superconsciousness
Or From Sexual Intercourse To Enlightenment .

The book narrates the profound theory
Yeah have sex first all freely.
And then by being zero yeah whole, lose in devotion
Thus he points out the the most appealing thing of the world.
Which is Devine or Demon is a course of discourse
But what the world says it wrong
Yes,the Almighty has made it basic of world existence .

It attracts persons rapidly violently and
puts in thrilling
Yes,it sells in highest numbers in the world
It is enjoyed by all under social contract and worldly manner.

And the buyers buy it on any cost under high inflammation vibes.
Adult movies are its open example and evidence.

Though openly it is banned in India.
And before 2020 on internet, porn movies,yeah,enjoyed a lot by the indians.

Rajnish lifted the most delicate and demanding thing
Why , because it’s the bitterest truth of life
That all produce with this activity
And so says- Hamaam mein sab nange
hain
Yes,in English-
All humans beings are nude under the cloth
Or in bathroom everyone is naked 🤩
In this fact the society has double face
On the name of legality ,yes,marriage it is green
And on the name of worldly religion it is oksyed.

It is proved if see the on track record
Yes Sunny Leone ,an Indian born
Western pornstar
Yeah ,watched a lot,searched a lot on internet in India.

About sex the mentality of the western world is broad
Though the biggest book on it has been written by the Indian
Yeah non other than great Vatsyaayana.

So ,there porn movies ever rocked here and there,out or inner in the world.

So Osho’s book drew enormous attention to the world .
And soon got global popularity.

The world knows that many fights have been fought for beauties
And many kings,chieftains ,ministers-
Yeah high
dignitaries , corporate,statesman,sports
icons and riches have slipped for it .

See great example of sage Rajarshi Vishwamitra -Menka, emperor Dushyant-Shakuntala ,Dusharath -Keikeyi ,Shantanu-Satywati.
And of decade 2K and 2k11,Jeffery Abstein file is its live proof
Its secrets ,yes,shaken the world.

Mr Rajneesh ‘s movement from sexual
experience toward meditation and transcendence.
This unusual philosophy attracted many Western followers.

His movement accumulated enormous wealth through the contributions of followers and supporters.

Due to a big demand of his American followers
Yes,in Nineteen-Eighyone, Rajneesh moved to the United States with his followers.

And wow , the thrilling movement established Rajneeshpuram in Oregon.

Ma Anand Sheela his intimate disciple
Yes,became the powerful administrative figure of the commune.

At Rajnish ‘s silence fast (moun vrat) period
She dominated single handedly.

The community expanded rapidly and attracted thousands of followers.

Money from followers financed its enormous development.

And then came the Red Army.
Rajneesh’s followers became famous for their red clothes, red cars and the
overwhelming presence of red everywhere.

Yeah, Red dresses,red accessories,
red surroundings—
as if the whole commune had been painted in one colour.
Yeah a red roses huge beds.

In India, red can carry associations of auspiciousness and energy.

In the Western imagination, red can also suggest danger, warning and alarm.

And a huge hamlet Rajneeshpuram eventually became a real alarm due to redden sphere.

Yes for sections of the American society and authorities.

Suddenly though projected-yeah ,for immigration fraud he is alleged by the US government.
And,ah, sent to jail legally.

While in an interview he said ,he was guiltless .
Its all happened ,because of unknowing
But at the fault and danger ~
He didn’t remain a preacher or guru
He told lie for escaping .
Thus , the fact was proven
Yes,he was merely a man of the earth.

Due to death threatening he tried to flee
Thus he was a death feared person and coward in practice.
While in an interview he said ,there is no God ,and due to death health ,life burden ,man projected God.

It was said that he had been trapped by the American Rule due to his popularity
But in real he was guilty and guilty.
And , under illegal immigration charges against him,imprisoned him.

And the USA government surprised with a big blow to him.

He had been compelled to leave America.

And no European nation readied to accept him.

RAJNISH said in an interview. Yes,he tried to flee secretly , due to death threaten.
Ah, I do say – where were his great sermons on it.
What about his preachings on it !
It means , yes, to say is easy .
But on ground or practically it’s not easy.

So the preacher who taught ,be bold ,don’t have fear of death, ah ,feared of death.

Ah,scared of threat and death,amazing. undigesting.

So he was a calculative man as a preacher.

And coward ,weak hearted man in real,who wanted to live.

The collapse of Rajneeshpuram involved serious criminal investigations.

Ma Anand Sheela and other leaders were implicated in crimes.

Rajneesh himself eventually made a plea agreement concerning immigration fraud and agreed to leave the United States.
Then what about his claim innocent.

He then travelled through several countries,
and his attempts to find a permanent home outside India became difficult.

It’s a big question why did he not prefer India for returning !

Ultimately, Nepal ,the then a lone Hindu Nation in the world.
Yes,sheltered him but under tourist visa,not permanent.
After completion the certain period.
He had to return in his home India.

Yes,for restful life
And for mingled in its pious soil for ever .

Rajneesh and his followers alleged that he had been poisoned while in American custody.
Ma Anand Sheela gave him fatal drugs. That allegation remains a disputed part of his story,
Therefore I would not write it as an established medical fact.
Because after death no postmortem process taken place.

He left the world in peace,ah,at the age of 58 only .
But ,okay ,according to the famous Indian movie Anand yeah~
Baboo Mosaay ,jindgi lambi nahi, badi honi chahiye.
Yes,in English~ The Life Must Not Be Longer But Should Be Good,Yeah ,Quality Prone.
In this aspect or mirror yes his life remained,ample and precious though remained full of controversy.

But what he raised under his sermons~

Yeah, mind blowing,mind boggling and always his voice is audible .
Yeah, still his audios and videos of speeches are hit on Internet .
Yes ,as teachings ,these are appealing.

🫀NK Sanatan

Genre-ProzAAAA
(MessazAAAA)
Field : Criticism Philosophy

☆Osho Rajanish Was A Coward Yeah A Paper Lion !☆

Yes,Acharya Rajnish as a person was a timid ,coward . As a preacher he was also coward. He was a spiritual leader or guru and amazing, he was feared of death or death threat. Why was he a coward Guru ? Yes,because he criticised by his great interpretation yeah the Hinduism, Jainism,Christianity all blatantly, boldly ,frankly but Islam. Why ,because except Islam, the three religions ‘ followers are liberal and tolerance customers . He chose these religions because the followers of these sects were and are digested in thinking or view. By choosing these three weaker religions, I mean moderate religions he proved the bitter fact of the world .
Yes, it is well observed that the rich people make poor people their prey,not strong . Even lion doesn’t choose harder or stronger animal or beast for his prey. And in the school a PTI ( physical teacher ) chooses a weak or sissy student to rebuke and beating or punishing ,not those or that student who is strong and by nature hot tampered and rough. Such as in the class if a subject teacher finds a strong or freaky student making mischief or indiscipline, he considered or reconciles with the self,yes,not slam him but student who is timid in nature the teacher at once says ,get out from the class ,either he punishes him in other ways . It is the custome of the
world that the weaker persons are always pay while mighty people dominate.Here, I mean Rajanish chose whole hearted liberal religions but not orthodox and revengeful religion- Islam . In the religion of Islam blasphemy is a big offense . And one who dare to condemn their Allah ,he is punished under FATWA yeah to murder or killing. So , no people dare to criticize Islam in director or indirect way. So , it’s clear that Rajnish was a feared person and despite a spiritual guru cared about his life . Thus , it’s clear that the DEATH is the utmost significant thing in the world,I mean no person want to die timely or untimely in the world and on any cost wants to live. Rajnish was not married,so there were no legal children . He amassed millions of money through his dense lovers or followers in donation or charity . Before his death Rajnish nominated Twenty-one devoted fundamental disciples as the handlers or as the trustee by alloting separate works of the commune or Asharns. Rajneesh had his younger brother as medical doctor in his organization and dense disciple but Rajneesh didn’t include him in the management body of his spiritual organization. Thus,he showed he was a true guru ,not a partial guru who believed on his prime disciples and not made warris of his spiritual empire to his younger brother Shailendra Saraswati. Thus he didn’t make a single successor or heir for his commune.

Rajanish had double face yes where he felt the risk he used his prudence or wisdom and cautiousness and enjoyed comfort zone . Yes,he never criticised Islam and Quaran boldly like other soft religions . So his cowardice nature and double face mock on him. If I compare Rajnish with the modern age Muslim writer Salman Rushdie and Tareq Fatemah are very bold that despite being the Muslim,they showed courage to write something sensitive but true in their critick approach on their religion Islam. In comparison to these two big bold and reckless persons, Rajnish was a a coward . Yes, Rajnish showed some courage, but at the ending part of his life but with caution becausehe knew after my death that extremist conservative lobby could be damaged his empire. Rajnish gave clearance about not criticise Islam because there were the people who were blind and orthodox and didn’t want to understand the reality and for them right of expression yeah deliver truth was an offense. He reacted that that faith’s people are slept people .And they don’t want to awake ,so it’s futile ,nonsense to awake them.They don’t want to listen truth so it’s not good to hit a stone on a wall. In this way on the name of intelligence and prudence he escaped with the reality. And being the intelligent person he knew that a lion who kills a huge animal to eat and starts eating but when he sees a hound of hyenas, he leaves the place .

●● RAJNEESH’S MIRROR: A CONTROVERSIAL LEGACY ●●

Rajneesh’s story reminds me of the later controversies surrounding powerful spiritual and celebrity figures.

The difference is that Rajneesh lived in an age
when today’s digital surveillance, smartphones and social media did not exist.

Therefore, many allegations, controversies and private activities
did not receive the instantaneous exposure that they might receive today.

His legacy therefore remains divided:

For some, he was a philosopher and spiritual rebel.

For others, he was a manipulative guru
who mixed spirituality, wealth, luxury, sexuality and power.

And perhaps this contradiction itself
is the most fascinating part of Rajneesh.

He left behind a personality
that cannot easily be placed into one box.

He enjoyed an extraordinarily luxurious lifestyle,
including a famous collection of Rolls-Royce cars.
Contemporary accounts also describe his diamond-studded watches and other luxuries.

He wore the appearance of a spiritual master,
while living amid extraordinary material comfort.

This contradiction became one of the major questions
around his personality.

According to material I once read in Dharmyug,
there was an extravagant claim about his sexual life—
that in only 54 years he had supposedly experienced
“600 years” worth of sexual living.

Whether that figure was literal, exaggerated or merely literary rhetoric,
it captures the extraordinary sexual mythology surrounding Rajneesh.

His sexual philosophy certainly became one of the most controversial parts of his legacy.

He gave sexuality a place inside his spiritual discourse,
something that shocked conservative society
and fascinated many Western followers.

And his style of meditation combined music, movement, celebration,
sexuality and spiritual experimentation.

He eventually accepted the title Bhagwan,
and later adopted the name Osho.

His legacy may appear dimmer in some circles today,
but his recorded speeches continue to circulate widely through social media and digital platforms.

As an intellectual persona,
I respect his wit, his knowledge and his extraordinary ability to speak.

But my focused, centric point is still my complaint.

I see in Rajneesh a man who could be extremely bold
while challenging some religious traditions,
yet much more cautious when dealing with others.

And here comes my comparison with Kabir.

Kabir was extraordinarily direct.

In a highly conservative age,
he dared to speak against religious hypocrisy
without much concern for the consequences.

His language was blunt:

Day is day.
Night is night.

That fearless quality is what I find remarkable in Kabir.

● Under Plain Definition: Was Osho Cowardly? ●

Yes, under my plain definition,
I call Acharya Rajneesh a timid or cowardly person
in one particular respect.

He was a spiritual teacher,
yet he was also a human being
who feared death and danger.

Why do I call him cowardly?

Because he openly criticised
Hinduism, Jainism and Christianity—
often with remarkable boldness.

He challenged established beliefs,
scriptures, priests and conventional morality.

But when it came to Islam,
I find his criticism much more cautious.

Here I would not say that all Muslims are radical
or that a fixed percentage of Muslims are dangerous.
That would be an unsupported generalisation.

Rather, my argument is about the existence of
radical or violent interpretations in some Islamic movements
and the fear surrounding blasphemy in certain societies.

My question is:

Did Rajneesh deliberately avoid subjects
where the personal danger appeared greater?

If yes,
then his courage had a boundary.

He could attack the sleeping mind
of a Hindu, Jain or Christian,
but when he sensed a dangerous reaction,
perhaps his prudence became stronger than his courage.

He sometimes used the argument that
there is no point in throwing a stone at a wall
that does not want to hear.

That may be philosophical wisdom.

But from my point of view,
it can also look like a convenient escape.

And therefore I ask:

Was it wisdom—or was it fear?

☆☆The Bravest Historic Figures : Yeah Of Ancient & Modern World In Telling Truth☆

Yes,Jesus Christ is the first known character in the world who dared to say what is truth and what is false. In the sheer dogmatic conservative age he became the sceptic and criticised on Judaism ‘s priests culture and wrong rites and beliefs.
For that truth introduction of real religion and Almighty the priests frowned and trapped Jesus in their web and under prosecution he had been crucified (the dreadest sentence or punishment ) with two thieves . Thus the cruel and conservative system tried to suppress the truth . Such as Galileo, Bruno and Socrates were punished for telling the truth. Thus ,the ancient history is cruel for telling the truth and still the scenario hasn’t changed much.
In the modern age ( Year 1980 to 2000) the world has seen three very courageous personalities-Salman Rushdie, Tarek Fatah and Taslima Nasarin, who dared out to write what is true in their great religion and what is misinterpreted in it. For that all these three been threatened, attacked but didn’t care .They were not coward like Rajneesh who afraid of to those extremists groups . I salute these trio for their bravery. They wrote reality ,didn’t care about the result. There are the nations in the world that sheltered those person and give full protection who dare to say truth.

■ India’s Great Poet and Critic Yeah the Bravest Guru ■
Kabir was a great Saint of his time and known for his blatant criticism on derogatory religious beliefs ,hypocrisy, superstitious beliefs . At the time there were two religions in India yeah Hinduism and Islam and Kabir lambasted so boldly where were wrong beliefs and rites . And for it he was attacked by the orthodox people yeah pandits and mullas ( Hindu Priests and Muslim Clerics) and also by the rulers .He was banished but remained constant and determined on his stand because of truth.

● Might Is Right: Theory Always Dances Freestyle ●

It is a commonly observed feature of human society
that powerful people often choose weaker opponents.

Even a lion does not necessarily attack the strongest animal available.
It looks for an opportunity where the risk is manageable.

I have seen a similar pattern in ordinary school life.

A PTI may choose a weak or timid student
to rebuke, punish or pressure the whole class.

But when a strong, hot-tempered and rough student creates trouble,
the teacher may think twice.

Why?

Because the cost of confrontation is different.

This is my “Might Is Right” observation.

The weak often pay,
while the mighty dominate.

And therefore I apply the same question to Rajneesh:

Did he choose those religious traditions
whose followers were more tolerant of criticism,
while avoiding direct confrontation with groups
where the consequences could become dangerous?

If so,
then perhaps his courage was selective.

■ Celibacy vs Bachelor ■

Rajnish was unmarried,
but unmarried does not automatically mean celibate.

Here we must distinguish the two words.

Bachelor means an unmarried man.

Celibacy, in its traditional religious sense,
usually means abstention from sexual relations,
often as part of a religious or spiritual discipline.

Rajneesh was therefore a bachelor,
but he did not practise sexual abstinence.

He promoted sexual experience as part of his philosophy.

So, in my phrase,
he was a modern bachelor-guru,
rather than a traditional celibate sage.

In Indian tradition,
celibacy has not always been an absolute condition for becoming a sage.

Yajnavalkya, for example, is traditionally described as having two wives,
Katyayani and Maitreyi.

Maitreyi is especially remembered in philosophical tradition
for her intellectual dialogue with Yajnavalkya.

The old Indian social order was very different from today’s.

Polygamy and multiple marriages existed in several historical societies and social classes.

Modern India, however, developed different social and legal norms,
with monogamy becoming the ordinary legal framework.

Divorce can change marital status,
and maintenance/alimony and child-support questions can arise afterwards.

But Rajneesh avoided the conventional burden of marriage
and lived a life of personal freedom.

That freedom was itself one of the contradictions
of his spiritual personality.

■ Assets and Money Showered on Rajneesh ■

Rajneesh’s organisation accumulated enormous resources
through donations, contributions and the dedication of followers.

The critic of conventional materialism
himself lived amid extraordinary luxury.

He became famous for his Rolls-Royce collection.
The Oregon Encyclopedia describes the public fascination with his
“dozens of Rolls Royce automobiles,” while contemporary accounts also describe his luxury watches and highly comfortable lifestyle.

Here again my question is simple:

If spirituality means detachment from worldly possessions,
why should a spiritual master need such enormous luxury?

This is one of the contradictions
I cannot easily digest in Rajneesh’s philosophy.

Regarding his family and succession,
I would not write that his brother simply became the legal heir
without documentary evidence of his will and the organisation’s legal structure.

What can safely be said is that his movement continued after his death
through institutional successors and disciples.

My objection therefore is not merely personal.

My question is philosophical:

If the spiritual master leaves behind an enormous organisation,
should its control belong to family, disciples,
or the wider spiritual community?

That question remains open.

■ Rajneesh’s Double Face ■

The world saw another contradiction in Rajneesh.

Where he felt safe,
he displayed extraordinary intellectual courage.

Where he sensed danger,
he showed extraordinary prudence.

I compare this quality with writers such as
Salman Rushdie and Tarek Fatah,
who publicly challenged aspects of Islamic religious and political thought
despite the risks associated with such criticism.

In comparison,
Rajneesh appears to me much more cautious.

I am not saying he had no courage.

He certainly had courage.

But I question whether his courage was equally distributed.

That is my complaint.

Rajneesh sometimes explained that there was no use provoking people
who were unwilling to understand.

Perhaps that is philosophical maturity.

But I ask again:

Where does prudence end and cowardice begin?

■ Islam Means Peace ! ■

Islam is one of the world’s major religions.

The word Islam is commonly associated with submission to God,
and the Arabic root is connected with ideas of peace and submission.

Christianity and Islam share many figures and traditions
with Judaism, and both are Abrahamic religions.

Their prophets and theological doctrines, however,
are not identical.

Jesus is central to Christianity,
while Muhammad is regarded by Muslims as the final prophet.

My question is not about every Muslim.

Millions of Muslims live ordinary lives of peace,
faith and family.

My criticism is directed towards
radical interpretations and violent political movements
that claim religious justification.

And here I return to Rajneesh:

Did he keep his distance from certain Islamic controversies
because he believed confrontation would bring unnecessary danger?

If that was his calculation,
then I call it prudence.

But if he claimed absolute intellectual fearlessness,
then I ask whether his prudence exposed a contradiction.

■ Rehman — One of the Names of Allah ■

Rahman is one of the well-known names of Allah out of Ninety-nine.And is generally translated as The Most Merciful or The Most Compassionate.

Here my question is deliberately provocative:

Where is that Rahman—
where is that mercy?

When innocent people are killed in the name of religion,
when terrorism is justified through religious language,
when hatred is taught instead of compassion,
I ask:

Are those really followers of Rahman?

I do not accept that the violence of extremists can be placed upon every
Muslim.

But I do question religious leaders
and ideological groups
when religion becomes an instrument of violence.

This is where my criticism stands.

And perhaps Rajneesh understood the danger of entering such territory
better than many of his admirers realise.

■ About Lonely Oneness Moments ■

Some critics and observers described Rajneesh
as a sex-guru because sexuality occupied such a visible place
in his teachings.

Why?

Because he presented sexuality not merely as physical pleasure
but as something that could, according to his philosophy,
be transformed into meditation and spiritual awareness.

In his ashram and meditation culture,
music, dance, celebration, movement and meditation
were often combined.

His approach was radically different
from traditional Indian asceticism.

He argued that suppressed sexuality could become an obstacle,
whereas conscious experience could be transformed into awareness.

This was one of the reasons
many Western followers were fascinated by him.

The atmosphere of his movement could involve music,
dance, celebration and intimate relationships.

The central claim was that human beings could pass
from bodily experience towards a state of inner witnessing.

Whether one accepts that theory or rejects it
is another matter.

But it certainly made Rajneesh
one of the most controversial spiritual figures of the twentieth century.

His philosophy was not simple spirituality.

It was a mixture of philosophy, meditation, rebellion, sexuality, wealth, celebration and contradiction.

And perhaps that is why he still attracts readers and listeners.

He could make a serious philosophical point
with a joke.

He could attack a sacred convention
with a smile.

He could speak about meditation
after speaking about sex.

He could wear the robe of a spiritual master
while living like a king of luxury.

That contradiction is Rajneesh.

And that contradiction is precisely
why I continue to question him.

I respect his intellectual sharpness.
I question his courage.
I admire his wit.
I challenge his contradictions.

That is my reading of Rajneesh.

 

***Osho’s Controversial Mirror In The Courtesan { Devkanya/Devdasi} Ancient System **

Osho Rajnish once lambasted on courtesan system by saying it is totally manmass projected to provide mating to riches with the beautiful young girls and also the priests ( Pujaris) . In the temples belles were put as the maid of temples for gods . But in real those beauties were kept kin the holy shrines to attract royals and riches to enjoy intimacy and pleasing with the heavenly enjoyed that rich mass used to donate enormous amount or asset to the temple Trust and also gifted big house and provide all comforts to those courtesans . Yes,that was indirect prostitution and the holy places were brothel houses or pagodas or roosts .

●Osho’s Ashram was indirectly roost of Devkanyas ●

Yes,its not an allegation its interpretation under Sanatan’s mind shake . What was the difference between ancient temples courtesans and Rajnish’s holy premises women.
Yes,in present beautiful young girls were delivered to the temple trust to serve in temple as maid as devotee of God. But it was projected plan of priests and trust to attract riches to amass donation by presenting or serving beauties to them to make please .They enjoyed and donated heavily to trust and also gifted those beauties ,yeah all facilities. Rajanish who once condemned that system now began it indirectly. Yes, in his ashram beauties visited as disciples and also their boyfriends. And there they enjoyed unpressed sex life and then lost in meditation . And those women who were rich and sexually unsatisfied yes,came to wanting sex with any partner as per monastery rule. For that they offered huge charity amount . So i put his ashram as indirect harlots place or courtesans haven.

■It was all money and dominance Game ■

Yes,money and dignity are the most preferred things in this worldly life . The closest disciple Anand Sheela played her worldly game . And betrayed her Guru. Rajnish trusted on her profoundly and made her number two after him. On exposed Rajnish said her bitch ,
witch. He accused her looting his money .

♤Dance Drugs, Holy Music And Chanting ♤

Yes,it was the Hippie culture but introduced in the East by Prabhupaad in india and Nepal then in America under registered organisation. He mesmerized many Americans and European and brought in India. Hippie culture had been seen in the bollywood movie Hare Krishna ,Hare Rama and Do chor. Those youth whose parents were separated sheltered in the organisation and found in the peaceful world . Rajnish borrowed this culture but adding his instinct theory of Sex first then devotion . Though not drugs ,wine in the premises but secretly it was in the mirror . His chief disciple Sheela exposed all blatantly though Rajnish denied .

■Yama’s Early call to Rajnish■

Yes,in an interview Rajnish said No there is no God in the world . But he was brought back.Where can’t say. As a controversial character or figure would he got Swatmrg or heaven is debatable. Yes, there is no Samadhi of Rajneesh like other greats . And his Samadhi is absolutely different from all. Yes,his remains (Ash and Bones) are put under his bed on which he used to sleep . And the disciples and devotees pay their respect at there by bowing heads or in their ways. Osho once said there is no God in the world but before two years ago of his death adopted the title of Bhagwan
( it’s a Hindi word which means God in English) and ah proved – Aham Brahamashmi (in Sanskrit ) ,Anal Haq (in Arabic ,Urdu) . So result of this life is ash and soil or dust .No person has born as an eternal figure whether it is an incarnation, son of god or prophet or guru. On Rajnish symbolic Samadhi yeah the words are inscribed~” Osho never born,never die,only visited this planet Earth between December 11,1931 to January 19,1990. Epitaph background is that these words were dictated himself by Osho before he felt that he would be no more long.

☆Essence of my PoemProzAAAA☆

Yes,my central focused point is that Osho was a bold person in theory but in practical he was a coward person. I do say being a spiritual guru he used to teach boldness in any condition, ah,himself feared due to death and death threaten. He didn’t dare to put transparent stand on Islam due to rigid lobby’s nature and Fatwa.
*NK Sanatan