●○ THE NEWS WOULD BE WRONG ALWAYS: YES, KHAMENEI COULD BE KILLED BY BODY BUT NOT BY SOUL , HIS IDEOLOGY ○●

 

■ RAKTABEEJA — THE IDEA,ALWAYS EXISTS And MULTIPLIES ■

 

Like Raktabija,

yeah,an infamous and dangerous demon associated with Shumbh. Shumbh became the king of Heaven by defeating Indra,the real king of paradise. Nishumbhu was Shumbh ‘s mighty younger brother. Raktabija was a chieftain of Shumbh ‘s mighty demon army. Thus this episode in Indian mythology,yeah ,from Markendaiy Puran and compiled in a much recited book Durga Saptshati during Navratra  The Holiest Fest of the Hindus .

 

Raktabija had received a strange miraculous boon,yeah, whenever a drop of his blood falls upon the earth, another Raktabija would emerge at once from it.

 

In an  encounter whenever Goddess Durga attacked him with an arrow,sword,mace or spear, his blood fell upon the ground and produced countless mighty Raktabijas.

 

Then Mahakali,an associated form of goddess Durga began drinking his blood before it could touch the earth or ground .

 

Due to that great device, the demon Raktabija ultimately became bloodless and was finally destroyed.

 

It is a powerful metaphor — yeah — for a destructive force whose mere physical destruction may not be enough if its roots, ideas and reproducing sources remain alive in the atmosphere .If we want to eradicate a tree or plant completely, merely cutting its trunk is not enough.Its roots must be removed.Even its seeds must not be allowed to reproduce which are spread surrounding due to wind .

■ Yes,to kill bad and negative ideology, the same device is all essential ■

A man may die, but an ideology — good or evil, humane or destructive — can continue to reproduce itself through the minds of others. And here comes my question.What happens when the body of an ideological leader disappears but the ideology remains alive? Iran has provided one of history’s striking examples.

● THE BODY DIES — THE IDEOLOGY SURVIVES ●

 

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of Islamic Republic and the first Supreme Leader of it, wow died in 1989 but left virus behind him ! After him his dearest disciple Ayatollah Ali Khamenei came in light , who he delivered his rigid legacy that made him the Supreme Leader and remained in that position for decades up to his the End .

Khamenei was killed in 2026 during a US-Israeli strike, according to international reporting that is proved when Iran Government arrangeda huge funeral ceremony. After  confirming  his death his elder  son Mojtaba Khamenei subsequently became Supreme Leader. Thus ,indirect monarchy grounded .

So, ah ! The body can be destroyed.

But the question~Can the ideology be destroyed ? And the answer is ~Never.

A government can be changed by the voters .Yes,a monarchy ,dictatorship can be uprooted. A ruler can die. A monument can fall. But an ideology — once it has entered thousands or millions of minds — may continue to reproduce itself.

Yeah, like the demon Raktabija.

Yes one body may be disappeared.

But what about the idea or view. Yes,if depletes ,yet another idea appears in the mind. Yes,another follower speaks. Another generation inherits the mentality. And the cycle continues.

■ DEMOCRACY IS WAILING IN THE NAME OF DEMOCRACY ■

Human-rights organisations have reported serious concerns about executions and politically-black spirituality motivated prosecutions in Iran.

 

Human Rights Watch reported that between March 18 and the end of August 2026, Iranian authorities executed at least 59 men on politically motivated or vague national-security charges, including at least 29 people connected with the December 2025–January 2026 protests. HRW also reported concerns about summary proceedings and torture-tainted confessions. But the humanitarian organisations could raise objections but can’t do directly. They could make pressure on the responsible authorities but would it work or not can’t be said.

Yes, Sanatan asks: “Is it an offense merely to be born on the Earth?” Ah ! A person does not choose where he or she will be born. Some are born in America. Some in India. Some in Argentina, Brazil, England or France,yeah ,the great democraticnstions and pleaders of global democracy.

 

And some are born under conservative or authoritarian systems where religion may be invoked to justify rigid political control ,yeah ,like Pakistan and Iran. Birth is not our choice. Yes, if destiny is written somewhere beyond our knowledge, then why should a person be punished for the land, regime or circumstances into which he happens to be born? Some people are fortunate enough to be born in democratic,yeah tolerant, liberal societies. Others are born in systems where questioning authority itself may become dangerous.

And history has shown this irony again and again.

Yeah,great figures Jesus, Bruno, Galileo and Socrates — each in different circumstances and eras — confronted powerful established beliefs or authorities and suffered because they dared to say what is true .

 

The right person is not always recognised as the right person by his own age.

Sometimes the age itself is wrong.

And sometimes the wrong people cannot digest the right people.

■ REBEL — BUT FOR WHAT? ■

A rebel may be called a criminal by the rulers of his time.

A rebel may be called a terrorist by an empire.

A rebel may be called an enemy by a government.

But history later asks:

What was the purpose of his rebellion?

What was the cause behind his inner rage?

India too has witnessed such reversals of historical judgment. Yes,Sardar

Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, Mangal Pandey and Subhas Chandra Bose were regarded by British imperial authorities as enemies or, in different contexts, as dangerous revolutionary figures.

Yet later Indian historical memory came to associate them with the struggle against colonial rule and ever saluted by the people of India as great and brave revolutionary and patriotic figures. Yes, so I do say:

Rebellion may be born from a demand for what the rebel considers right; and tyranny may attempt to crush that voice.

The judgment of history can sometimes be very different from the judgment of the ruling establishment.

♡ IRAN — A REPUBLIC IN QUESTION ♡

Iran’s official political system is the Islamic Republic.But Sanatan asks: Can the word “Republic” truly flourish where dissent may carry the price of imprisonment or even death?

Yeah — this is not an attack upon Islam. Yes,Islam is a holier and truer religion and its real ideology according to the holy Quran is a superb religion .

The Islam I know through my reading is a religion that teaches moral and human values . But some crooked it in their ways for their dominance and comfort of belly and body turned it into the orthodox frame .

I do not blame Almighty Allah for the deeds of rulers. Why ?

Yrah ,because an act of cruelty cannot automatically be attributed to the religion whose name is invoked by the person committing it.

Rulers, political leaders and clerics may interpret religion in ways that serve their own authority, dominance or interests.

Nor should the Prophet or the religion itself automatically be held responsible for every political or orthodox action carried out in its name. The question is not simply:

“What religion do you follow?”

Yeah ! The deeper question is:

“What do you do in the name of that religion?” A religious title does not automatically make a person religious in character. A man may wear the appearance of religion and yet act against compassion, justice and humanity ( in this regards an indian idiom is very famous, yesi- Muh mein Ram Bagal me Chhuri / Bagla Bhagat -means in appearances so religious but under the garment the nature is evil) values that believers themselves associate with God. That is where the contradiction begins.

♤ ISLAMIC REPUBLIC — A MOCKERY?!? ♤

Islamic Republic !

😠😠😞😠😠

Yes — what a contradiction it can appear to be! Ah! What a mockery, if the word Republic promises people’s sovereignty while people themselves fear raising their voices. Democracy laughs.Then democracy cries. And finally democracy says-

” O’ linguistics of the words,please change my name “.

“Do not attack my name to a system in which my own voice is afraid to speak and to using my name in Iran ,ah ,I feel ashamed.” Ah ! I cannot endure this insult.

By the word Republic, I am associating it with a political reality which critics say does not provide the full democratic freedom that the word may suggest my real spirit .

And who introduced the religious element into this broad political formulation? It’s really a job of the devil.

■ A religious leader. A holy

man, in the eyes of his followers ■

Yet when religion becomes an instrument of political domination, religion itself may become a victim of the political system built in its name. The tragedy is not that Islam exists.

The tragedy is when religion is used as a political weapon. This thing also happened in the Christianity, yeah ,Church’s interfere in the regime . And we see the blind and orthodox believers crucified Jesus Christ who preached the truth and that truth was considered as a crime .

● THE TWO TWIN SISTERS — YOUNG VOICES TURNED INTO SIGHS ●

The world has recently heard the disturbing case of Iranian twin sisters Taraneh Rahimi and Romina Rahimi.

Reports describe them as young women who were among people tried in Isfahan city,Iran.

in connection with the January 2026 protests.

According to RFE/RL’s Radio Farda, their family alleged that the sisters were tortured and forced to confess to charges they denied. Taraneh was sentenced to death, while Romina received a 25-year prison sentence, according to the reporting available at the time.

Ah! Two twins. Two sisters. Born only minutes apart.

But today, according to the reported sentences, one faces the gallows while the other faces decades behind bars.

Ah! When Allah is mighty, then why is cruelty being committed by people who invoke His great name?

This is Sanatan’s question.

■ Two Sisters’ Young Voices

Could shudder Iran Religious Web And Provoke Youth■

What a tragedy!

The reported charges include moharebeh (An Arabic word with Persian term) ,commonly translated as “waging war against God” or “enmity against God,” along with other charges connected to the protests. Human-rights organisations have raised serious concerns about the fairness of proceedings and allegations concerning coerced confessions.

But, ah! Those organisations can raise the question only.

The question remains:

Is participation in an anti-government demonstration such a heinous offence that the ultimate punishment must be death?

It is a serious question.

May a government call a protest sedition?

Yes or no?

But it is equally true that a protester may regard protest as the exercise of a civil or democratic right.

And between these two definitions stands the law.

Therefore, the law must be blind —

but not blind to justice.

■ A BLIND LAW TRAPPED TWO SISTERS FOR THE RIGHT TO PROTEST ■

 

The Goddess of Justice is traditionally shown with a blindfold.

Why?Because justice is supposed to be blind to status.

She must not see whether the accused is rich or poor.

Male or female.

Powerful or powerless.

Majority or minority.

But, ah!

If the blindfold becomes blindness to truth itself, then the symbol of justice becomes a mockery.

■ Corruption becomes the real god. ■

 

Bribery becomes the real law behind the curtain.

Crooked evidence becomes the weapon.

And the innocent person becomes trapped.

Yes, to know this bitter truth and see this dimmed mirror, I ask:

Should the honourable court discover the truth?

♡ IN THE ISLAMIC FAITH — A REFERENCE TO GOD’S JUSTICE ♡

Yes, Islam’s concept of Almighty Allah is fundamentally different from Hindu traditions in which divine powers may be represented in male and female forms.

In Islam, Allah is not represented as a male deity with a wife or consort.

So the Hindu symbolic image of a blindfolded Goddess of Justice does not belong to Islamic theology.

Yet the underlying principle remains:

Justice must be just.

The law should not ask:

“Who are you?”

It should ask:

“What evidence is there against you?”

That is the real question.

● TWO YOUNG WOMEN — ONE SENTENCE, ONE LIFE IN PRISON ●

Taraneh Rahimi and Romina Rahimi have become a symbol of a larger question surrounding political dissent in Iran.

Their family disputes the allegations and has alleged torture and forced confessions.

If such allegations are established, then the matter becomes even more serious.

Because justice cannot be created through torture.

Truth cannot be manufactured through fear.

And a confession obtained under torture cannot become a substitute for reliable evidence. But, ah! This is exactly where the darkness begins.

○ A COURTROOM — HELPLESS, YES, A PARASITE? ○

Yes, the court and the courtroom.

Are they truly independent?

Why? Because a court hears and evaluates what is presented before it. The real players may be the investigators, police, prosecutors and defence lawyers. Evidence may be genuine. Evidence may be incomplete.

Evidence may be challenged.

Evidence may even be alleged to have been manipulated. And witnesses?

Ah! Witnesses may be reliable.

Or they may be pressured, mistaken, purchased or projected.

Even when a witness swears upon his or her holiest book, the oath itself cannot manufacture truth.

So, to know this bitter truth and look into this dimmed mirror, I ask:

Should the honourable court merely pronounce upon what is presented — or should justice relentlessly search for the truth?

■ WHERE IS THE WORTHY UN AND ITS HUMANITARIAN SECTION? ■

Yes! Where is the United Nations?

Where are the world’s human-rights institutions?

Where are the women’s organisations?

Where are those who speak for women when two young women face such severe punishment?

The United Nations has human-rights mechanisms for scrutiny, but international action is complicated by sovereignty, diplomacy and political divisions among states.

And the veto power of the five permanent members of the Security Council can make collective action difficult.

So Sanatan asks:

If injustice is taking place, should the world remain silent?

The answer, at least morally, cannot be silence. But where is morality ?

Ah! In the world, immorality often rules in its own defiant way and mood.

Human rights should not depend upon geography.

A human being is a human being.

Whether born in America, India, Iran, Pakistan, France or anywhere else in the world.

■ WHY WERE THESE TWO YOUNG SISTERS TARGETED? ■

Yeah! This is the question that troubles me.

This is the question that provokes me.

Here I extract a great couplet from one of India’s major Hindi poets, Dushyant Kumar:

“Mahaz hangaamaa karnaa meraa maqsad nahin;

Meri aah ki surat badalni chaahiye.”

Yeah Meaning of these lines:

Merely creating an uproar is not my purpose; the form of my sigh — the condition that produces it — should change.

That is precisely the question.

Those protesters who come onto the roads or grounds to reveal their agony and complaint against a faulty system — are they necessarily criminals?

Or has the system trapped them in its own net?

Were they merely protesters?

Were they victims of a larger political struggle over rights and power?

Yes! The evidence must answer.

But, ah! Evidence itself can be presented in different ways. Not propaganda.xNot emotion. Not torture.zNot fear. Only evidence. And genuine evidence.

Human-rights organisations have reported that Iranian authorities have continued to execute protesters and political dissidents following proceedings they regard as grossly unfair. Human Rights Watch says dozens of others remain at risk of execution.

Ah! When a government becomes afraid of a voice, it may try to silence the voice.

But can it silence the idea?

That is the question.

■ DEATH — THE ONLY FEAR? ■

Death is perhaps — no, surely — one of the greatest fears in the world.

Why? Because it has only one road.

ONE WAY.

After death, no one returns to ordinary earthly life.

Literally: No return ticket.

That is why tyrannical systems may use death as a weapon of fear.

But the strange irony of history is this:

A death may end a life,

but it does not necessarily end an idea.

Sometimes the dead become louder than the living.

●● THE SOUL OF AN IDEA CANNOT BE HANGED ●●

Therefore, my opening sentence returns:

Yes, Ali Khamenei could be killed by body — but not necessarily by soul, his ideology.

He is physically gone.

But if his political and religious ideology continues to influence minds, then the ideological legacy remains.

The body can be killed.

The voice can be silenced.

But the soul of an idea may continue to speak.

And perhaps this is one of the greatest lessons of history:

You may hang a human being,

but you cannot hang a question.

You may imprison a body, but you cannot imprison an idea forever.

You may silence a voice, but somewhere another voice may say:

“WHY? WHY? WHY?”

And that single word may sometimes become the beginning of history’s next chapter.

■ THE FUNERAL OF THE VILLAIN OF IRANIAN DEMOCRACY ■

Amazing! After months of delay, the remains of Ali Khamenei were finally buried publicly in July 2026.

His funeral ceremonies were enormous.

Reports said that millions participated in the week-long mourning and funeral events; Iranian estimates were even higher, while independent estimates varied.

But here comes another striking fact.

Ali Khamenei’s son and successor, Mojtaba Khamenei, did not appear publicly during the funeral ceremonies.

Three other sons — Mostafa, Meysam and Masoud — were shown attending funeral prayers, while Mojtaba remained absent from public view.

Why? Why ? Why ?

Due to Security?

Due to Fear?

Due to severe Injury?

Or something else?

According to my view ,yes,fear of death and death only. Yes,its a bitter fact that no one wants to die or leave this world. It is the much lured truth.

Amazing that a death giver customer feared of death !

The available reporting does not establish one definitive explanation.

And therefore Sanatan asks:

Were all those who joined the funeral genuine well-wishers?

Or did some come because of political pressure, fear, social obligation or loyalty to the Islamic Republic?

Ah! The world cannot read every mourner’s heart. That is another unanswered question.

And yet the size of the funeral demonstrates one undeniable fact:

Khamenei remained an enormously consequential and deeply polarising figure in Iran and beyond.

His funeral drew huge crowds, while his son remained absent from public view.

Life is precious.

Fear of death is real.

And political power often understands this human fear very well.

□ THE USA vs RUSSIA □

Yes! Both the United States and Russia are major powers of the contemporary world.

And between great powers there is often rivalry, competition and strategic calculation.

Look at Ukraine.

Russia attacked Ukraine.

Ukraine continued to resist, while the United States and other countries provided military, economic and political support to Ukraine.

That is one part of the larger geopolitical picture.

And then comes Iran.

The United States and Iran have been involved in a major conflict in 2026, while Russia and China have their own strategic interests in relation to Iran and the wider region.

China has also been deeply concerned about the energy consequences of the conflict, particularly because of the importance of the Strait of Hormuz and oil supplies.

So here comes the old geopolitical saying:

“Enemy’s enemy is always a friend.”

But is it really always so?

No! International politics is rarely so simple.

Countries do not necessarily become friends merely because they oppose the same power.

They may cooperate temporarily because their interests overlap.

That is geopolitics.

America has its interests.

Russia has its interests.

China has its interests.

Iran has its interests.

And the common people?

Ah! They often pay the price of the rivalry among powers.

That is why Sanatan asks:

When superpowers play the chess of geopolitics, who counts the tears of ordinary people?

**NK SANAATAN.